Proof as to electronic signature.
What this section does
Where an electronic signature is alleged to belong to a particular subscriber, the fact that it is indeed that subscriber's electronic signature must be proved, except in the case of a secure electronic signature (which carries a presumption of authenticity under the Information Technology Act).
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
An electronic signature must be proved to be that of the alleged subscriber unless it is a secure electronic signature.
When it applies
- A party relying on a digitally signed contract must prove the electronic signature belongs to the defendant, unless it qualifies as a secure electronic signature.
- An OTP-based e-signature on a loan agreement must be proved to have been affixed by the subscriber.
Derived from IEA s.67A.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 66, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 66 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.