Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given.
What this section does
Secondary evidence of the existence, condition, or contents of a document is admissible in seven specified situations: when the original is in the possession of the opposing party, a person beyond the Court's process, or a person legally bound to produce it who fails to do so after notice; when the original's contents are admitted in writing by the opponent; when the original is destroyed, lost, or cannot be produced without default of the party; when the original is not easily movable; when it is a public document; when a certified copy is permitted by law; or when the originals are too numerous for convenient Court examination. The Explanation specifies which type of secondary evidence is admissible in each case.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Secondary evidence of a document is admissible only in the seven enumerated circumstances, with the type of secondary evidence permissible varying according to the applicable circumstance.
When it applies
- Where the original agreement is in the possession of the defendant who refuses to produce it after notice, the plaintiff may give secondary evidence of its contents.
- Where the original of a public document is held in a government office and is not easily movable, a certified copy is the only permissible secondary evidence.
Derived from IEA s.65.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 60, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 60 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.