Presumption as to powers-of-attorney.
What this section does
The Court shall presume that every document purporting to be a power-of-attorney, and to have been executed before and authenticated by a Notary Public, Court, Judge, Magistrate, Indian Consul or Vice-Consul, or representative of the Central Government, was indeed so executed and authenticated. This is a mandatory presumption that dispenses with further proof of execution.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Court must presume due execution and authentication of a power-of-attorney authenticated by a notary or specified official.
When it applies
- A power-of-attorney purporting to be notarised before an Indian Consul in London is presumed to have been duly executed and authenticated without calling the Consul as a witness.
- A power-of-attorney authenticated before a Magistrate is tendered in a property transaction dispute — the court presumes its due execution.
Derived from IEA s.85.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 84, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 84 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.