Previous bad character not relevant, except in reply.

What this section does

In criminal proceedings, evidence of the accused's bad character is generally irrelevant. It becomes relevant only if the accused has first put his good character in issue. A previous conviction is expressly stated to be relevant as evidence of bad character. The section does not apply where bad character is itself a fact in issue.

AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).

The rule in one line

Bad character of the accused is irrelevant in criminal proceedings unless the accused has raised good character, or bad character is itself a fact in issue; a previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.

When it applies

• If the accused leads evidence of his good character, the prosecution may then introduce evidence of his prior convictions or bad reputation in rebuttal.
• Where the charge itself involves habitual conduct (e.g., being a habitual offender), bad character is a fact in issue and is directly relevant.

Derived from IEA s.54.