Confession to police officer.
What this section does
No confession made to a police officer is provable against the accused. Similarly, no confession made while in police custody is provable unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. However, where a fact is discovered as a consequence of information received from an accused in police custody, so much of that information as distinctly relates to the fact discovered is admissible, whether or not it amounts to a confession.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Confessions to police officers or made in police custody (without a Magistrate present) are inadmissible; only the discovery-linked portion of such information is admissible.
When it applies
- An accused in police custody says 'I hid the knife under the floorboard' and the knife is found there — the portion of the statement relating to the discovery of the knife is admissible.
- An accused confesses in full detail to a police officer — the entire confession is inadmissible against him regardless of its voluntariness.
Practitioner note
Consolidates IEA ss. 25 and 27. The proviso on discovery of facts corresponds to the celebrated 'discovery statement' rule under old s.27, interpreted in Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor (1947 PC).
- EVIDENCE Section 25 — Confession to police officer — not provable
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 23, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 23 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.