Privilege not waived by volunteering evidence.
What this section does
A party who gives evidence in a suit does not thereby consent to the disclosure of privileged advocate-client communications under section 132. If a party calls an advocate as a witness, consent to disclosure is deemed given only to the extent the party questions the advocate on matters that would otherwise be privileged.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Merely giving evidence or calling an advocate as a witness does not waive legal professional privilege unless the party actively questions the advocate on privileged matters.
When it applies
- A plaintiff who testifies in his own suit does not thereby allow his advocate to reveal confidential instructions.
- If a defendant calls his advocate as a witness but does not question him on privileged communications, those communications remain protected.
Derived from IEA s.128.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 133, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 133 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.