Witness unable to communicate verbally.
What this section does
A witness who cannot speak may give evidence by writing, signs, or any other intelligible manner in open court, and such evidence is treated as oral evidence. Where a witness is unable to communicate verbally, the Court must take the assistance of an interpreter or special educator to record the statement, and the statement must be videographed.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Evidence given by a mute witness through writing, signs, or other intelligible means in open court is deemed oral evidence; verbal inability requires interpreter/special educator assistance and videography.
When it applies
- A deaf-mute witness communicates answers by sign language through a special educator in open court; this is treated as oral testimony.
- A witness who loses the power of speech due to injury writes answers on paper in open court; the written answers constitute oral evidence.
Practitioner note
The proviso mandating videography and special educator assistance is a new addition under BSA 2023, not present in IEA s.119.
Derived from IEA s.119.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 125, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 125 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.