Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.
What this section does
When it is shown that a married woman committed suicide within seven years of marriage and that her husband or his relative subjected her to cruelty, the court may presume that the suicide was abetted by the husband or such relative. This is a discretionary presumption ('may presume'), not a mandatory one. 'Cruelty' carries the same meaning as under section 86 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Suicide by a married woman within seven years of marriage, coupled with proof of cruelty by husband or his relative, raises a discretionary presumption of abetment.
When it applies
- A woman married for four years commits suicide after being subjected to persistent harassment by her husband; the court may presume the husband abetted the suicide.
- Where a mother-in-law is shown to have subjected a bride to cruelty and the bride commits suicide within five years of marriage, the court may presume abetment by the mother-in-law.
Derived from IEA s.113A.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 117, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 117 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.