Burden of proof as to relationship in the cases of partners, landlord and tenant, principal and agent.
What this section does
Where persons have been shown to be acting as partners, landlord and tenant, or principal and agent, the burden of proving that such relationship does not exist or has ceased lies on the party who so affirms. The section protects the continuity of established legal relationships. Once the relationship is shown to have existed, its termination must be proved by the party alleging it.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
The rule in one line
Proof of prior conduct as partners, landlord-tenant, or principal-agent shifts the burden of disproving the relationship to the party denying it.
When it applies
- Where two persons have been shown to be conducting business as partners, the party claiming the partnership has ended must prove its dissolution.
- A landlord-tenant relationship having been established by past conduct, the party asserting it has ceased must discharge the burden of proof.
Derived from IEA s.109.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BSA Section 112, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BSA Section 112 forms part of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam which replaced the Indian Evidence Act 1872 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.