Dispute concerning right of use of land or water.
What this section does
When an Executive Magistrate is satisfied that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists regarding any alleged right of user of land or water (whether claimed as an easement or otherwise), he shall make a written order requiring the parties to attend and submit written statements of their claims. The Magistrate shall hear parties, receive and consider evidence, and decide whether such right exists; if it does, he may prohibit interference with its exercise and may order removal of obstructions, subject to the condition that the right must have been exercised within three months before receipt of the report (or during the last relevant season for seasonal rights). Proceedings may be converted between this section and section 164 if the Magistrate finds the dispute falls under the other provision.
AI-generated plain-language summary. For the binding statutory text, see India Code (official).
Procedure at a glance
- Key actors
- Executive Magistrate · Police officer · Parties to the dispute · Advocate
- Time limit
- Right of user must have been exercised within 3 months before receipt of the police report or information (or during the last relevant season/occasion for seasonal rights) for an order to be made
Derived from CrPC s.147.
Read the official text
For the binding statutory text of BNSS Section 166, refer to the Gazette of India or the India Code official website.
Why this matters
BNSS Section 166 forms part of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita which replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 on 1 July 2024. Any new filing, FIR, charge sheet, or bail application made on or after that date should cite the new section number. References to the old act in legacy documents remain valid for matters that arose before the changeover.